• Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Are they still pretending they don’t support him? I thought for sure they’d all have given that ruse up the moment he won.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Nah, they can go their entire lives pretending not to be dictator simps. When it comes to tankies, it was never about the communism and always about the tanks treading over the plebs.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Well hey, one of the reasons one might stop a genocide is because it’s been accomplished. So they may end up being technically correct on the first part.

  • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    They’re not actually going to stop, the news will just stop reporting about it, because we’ve got distraction-in-chief on twitter again daring North Korea to nuke us.

    I remember 2017.

  • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    On the incredibly infinitesimally insignificantly microscopically small chance that Trump somehow accidentally but actually stops the genocide, I won’t bother looking that gift horse in the mouth. I’ll just be thankful and move on to the litany of other problems.

    • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      Its the same with RFK wanting to legalise psychedelics in some way. Thats something that is in fact good, but that doesn’t compensate for him being not suited for this position.

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    And then there is the rest of the Fediverse thinking this squabble between. World and. Ml is fucking retarded

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Every single word which has been used to refer to a mentally disabled person will, eventually, become a slur.

        “Idiot” and “moron” used to be technical medical terms. There actually used to be a whole spectrum, with “idiot” being a pretty profound level of disability, meaning that someone’s mental age was around two years old or younger.

        “Retarded” was a new invention, to introduce a new term which didn’t overlap with the slurs for a non-disabled person who was being stupid. Eventually, it came to be used as a slur, at which point we couldn’t used it for actually disabled people anymore. This cycle will repeat, I think, without end.

        Probably the best thing to do is use terms which are too cumbersome to easily become slurs. “Mentally disabled” is one.

        • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I just had a comment removed for using the M-word. I replaced it with stupid, hopefully that passes the purity test. It occurred to me that dumb could easily be construed as offensive to those who are unable to speak, much more justifiably than the R-word, in my opinion.

          Mentally disabled is already quite unacceptable according to some, the current cutting edge of political correctness is probably persons of/with intellectual disability. Which will probably last a couple years before we need to come up with something else.

          It’s eerily reminiscent of Orwellian themes of doublespeak and Newspeak. Limiting the functionality of language in order to prevent the expression of undesirable or socially disruptive thoughts.

          All of this is also massively complicated by the fact that languages other than English exist. This rapid lexical treadmill that we are currently on is quite certainly discriminatory towards non-native English speakers, because they will inevitably inadvertently use outdated terminology and be judged for it, while those who are privileged enough to be close to the sources of political correctness such as they exist will have an inherent social advantage due to that.

          We live in an extremely highly regarded society, congrats all around 👏

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    what genocide? arabs attack, rape, and murder, then esconce the terrorists directly in and between civilian populations for the sole reason so that when israel responds the body count can be escalated and used as public relations. genocide. shame on you.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    The fact that some people voted for a basically open fascist because of something happening outside of their country is fucking wild

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I just hate when they say one imperialist colonizer is bad (Israel) yet another good (Russia). Fucking hypocrites don’t actually care about the suffering - just the political wedge they can use.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I haven’t ever even broached Tibet because I don’t think I could stomach witnessing the ensuing trainwreck of logic.

        It’s just so incredibly intellectually disingenuous. I got in it with one at one point (big mistake on my part) saying that no country or system is perfect, and a meaningful indicator evidencing critical thought is the capacity to criticize your own system. What, in their mind, were the top issues with China?

        1. Too much freedom in the market.
        2. Doesn’t project it’s system outside it’s border enough.

        Ok. I’m talking to a rational actor. Lol.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I’ve had so many CCP bootlickers send me so many headlines about how much people in China claim to love the CCP. Tankies pretend they don’t understand that a 99% approval rating is less indicative of a populace that adores their government, and more indicative of a populace afraid to criticize it.

          Part of what got me banned over there was pointing out that Adolf Hitler got 99.3% of the votes in his last election, and asking whether they reckon that was because he was just such a great leader

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    People need to remember Netanyahu wants Trump in power, so is going to make decisions that are good optics for Trump when he can. He similarly made decisions that are bad optics for Biden on purpose. While Biden did himself no favors, never forget Netanyahu is the one who put him in that position.

  • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    I would like to remind people this conflict is decades and decades old, it’s not a democrat thing, or republican thing. America has supported this genocide for over 50 years. The democrats and republicans of now will surely, if unfortunately, continue.