So I’m glad he was compensated, but I struggle to take his stance seriously when he works for a neoliberal think tank and genuinely believes his personal travel arrangements make any difference whatsoever when someone like him should definitely be aware that billionaires emit more carbon pollution in 90 minutes than the average person does in a lifetime (spare me the “every little help” platitude, at the scales we’re discussing here, this person’s itinerary makes zero difference, and only serves to alleviate his personal guilt. The only difference we can make as individuals is to unite and tear down the systems that are actually destroying the planet, and the people responsible).
If someone does something psychotic a lot, does that make it ethical for someone-else to do it even once?
A. air travel isn’t “psychotic”, fuck off with that ableism and
B. he wouldn’t be doing it once, he would be doing it 0.00000000000000001% of a time
So again:
spare me the “every little help” platitude, at the scales we’re discussing here, this person’s itinerary makes zero difference, and only serves to alleviate his personal guilt.
And apparently, some of yours, too!
Well, if he worked during the trip, why fire him? Was it that much more expensive to travel slowly?
Huge respect for the man but
His research trip in 2023 meant taking 40 days to travel from Europe to Bougainville and 72 days to return. According to his calculations, carbon emissions from this slow 28,000-kilometer (17,400-mile) round trip was 10 times lower than flying.
Taking 50x the travel time to safe 10x in emissions… I don’t think I have it in me. I accept to replace a 45 minutes flight eith 10 hours of train but that’s about the limit of my sanity.
The real travel are the friends we make along the way
I have to agree, but I also respect the hell out of anyone willing to stick to their beliefs this hard.
That’s some Willy Fog lecel of perseverance though. In fact, Willy Fog had better options before air travel became a thing.
