Nemeski@lemm.ee to Meta@lemdro.idEnglish · 2 days agoMeta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seedingarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comsingularity@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.onlinepiracy@lemmit.online
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkMeta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seedingarstechnica.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Meta@lemdro.idEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square17fedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.comsingularity@lemmit.onlinetechnology@lemmit.onlinepiracy@lemmit.online
minus-squareadarza@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agothat legal argument doesn’t fly in the u.s… but if you wanna buy a ruling that says downloading isn’t piracy, go for it.
minus-squareumbrella@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoit flies if you are zuckerberg apparently
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoWhat’s the precedent and current consensus for caselaw? I remember that Capitol v. Thomas kicked off the notion of “making available” as an infringement of the distribution right, but I haven’t followed everything that came after.
that legal argument doesn’t fly in the u.s…
but if you wanna buy a ruling that says downloading isn’t piracy, go for it.
it flies if you are zuckerberg apparently
What’s the precedent and current consensus for caselaw? I remember that Capitol v. Thomas kicked off the notion of “making available” as an infringement of the distribution right, but I haven’t followed everything that came after.