Spy agency said in December it would give Conservative leader briefing without him needing security clearance

  • Rav Sha'ul@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Liberals wanted Poilievre legally silenced because his arguments were winning against the Liberal talking points. So if he is now forced to stay silent then that allows the Liberals to lie to the people, lie to the public, and Poilievre can’t explain why what they are saying is false. But with him not getting security clearance he can point out falasies in their statements and argue against their logic and there is no legal danger for anything he says because he has not seen anything.

    If Poilievre sees some secret information and fires a member of his own Conservative party that is mentioned in the information, Poilievre violated the security act and legally he’s out. Without that security clearance he has full reign as leader without confines or legal restrictions.

    • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Without that security clearance he has full reign as leader without confines or legal restrictions.

      No, he doesn’t. Go peddle your dictatorship fantasies elsewhere.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      So if he is now forced to stay silent then that allows the Liberals to lie to the people, lie to the public, and Poilievre can’t explain why what they are saying is false.

      Nobody is forcing PP to stay silent. He doesn’t want to get security clearance because then he wouldn’t be able to lie about shit he’s been privy to.

      If you can’t speak to facts, sit down.