Zerush@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoDavid Sacks claims there's 'substantial evidence' that DeepSeek used OpenAI's models to train its own | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkDavid Sacks claims there's 'substantial evidence' that DeepSeek used OpenAI's models to train its own | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comZerush@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square59fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareharsh3466@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 day agoCame to say something similar. Like I give a fuck that OpenAI’s model/tech/whatever was “stolen” by Deepseek. Fuck that piece of shit Sam Altman.
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day ago“Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable. It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.
minus-squarejust another dev@lemmy.my-box.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 days agoYes it is. Although I agree that I have no moral objections to it.
Stealing from thieves is not theft
Came to say something similar. Like I give a fuck that OpenAI’s model/tech/whatever was “stolen” by Deepseek. Fuck that piece of shit Sam Altman.
“Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable.
It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.
Yes it is. Although I agree that I have no moral objections to it.