Regarding recent actions, such as the numerous instances of arson and gunfire targeting Tesla’s vehicles and factories, as well as the recent attack on SAIF CEO Chip Terhune’s home, do you believe that these acts of resistance help further the cause, or do they risk undermining the broader movement? How do you view the effectiveness of such actions in sending a message versus escalating the conflict or perpetuating further corporate contention or militancy? Should these actions continue?
You must log in or register to comment.
Individual acts of violence without a broader strategy will in the end not accomplish much. I guess there is a somewhat of a propaganda effect in that it forces people to recon with the possibility of using voilence, but the violence itself doesn’t really dismantle the corporate system being targeted. It’s unclear how much the corporate system (the tesla company) is even weakened by such acts. I guess it might cause insurance rates to rise if something like this became a frequent occurrence.