schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoUS Rep proposes bill to give video game buyers "ownership," not "a license"arstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square43linkfedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down15cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zipgames@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1294arrow-down1external-linkUS Rep proposes bill to give video game buyers "ownership," not "a license"arstechnica.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square43linkfedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zipgames@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareGodort@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 day agoIf a bad person supports a good cause, that doesn’t make the cause bad.
minus-squareceenote@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-21 day agoI agree, it’s more about pointing out that it doesn’t make the bad person good, especially when they’re pushing the bill at a time where it has no chance of passing.
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoI think all three statements in this chain are accurate and true. But it does leave me not really knowing how to feel about this. I guess mostly disappointed, because the most salient point to me is the last one, that this is really unlikely to pass. So that’s a genuine shame.
If a bad person supports a good cause, that doesn’t make the cause bad.
I agree, it’s more about pointing out that it doesn’t make the bad person good, especially when they’re pushing the bill at a time where it has no chance of passing.
I think all three statements in this chain are accurate and true. But it does leave me not really knowing how to feel about this.
I guess mostly disappointed, because the most salient point to me is the last one, that this is really unlikely to pass. So that’s a genuine shame.