Rumors are that Alcom’s rights to “The Expanse” may have reverted to the Creators’ new production company

      • roofuskit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        So you didn’t read that?

        More than five years after The Expanse aired its series finale, the acclaimed sci-fi show is officially returning with a huge new release (literally) celebrating its complete television run. Titan Books has announced The Expanse: The Complete Visual History, a massive 320-page hardcover retrospective scheduled to release in the US/UK on August 17, 2027. Written by Mike Avila, the book is being billed as a “comprehensive behind-the-scenes look” at all six seasons of the television series.

        • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          That plus the game, rights reverting back… not an official announcement but indications that the license is well alive and someone could very much capitalise on that to add one more season.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Nobody is saying this isn’t happening but there’s nothing “solid” about this until there’s at least an official announcement.

            • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              Wtf don’t you understand in « indications » and why the hell are you popping up here? Go get some attention elsewhere.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Don’t rely on imdb for anything in the future. That article is Screenrant who are even less reliable.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          In this case the poster is unreliable because they didn’t read the article, just the deceptive headline.

          • Lumidaub@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 days ago

            Nothing specific, I just look out for posts from a variety of pages that have in the past been reliable (or at least haven’t shown themselves to be unreliable). I also don’t need to know everything the second there’s a rumour so I can wait until there are more sources confirming before I form an opinion.

            • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 days ago

              That’s not helping… IMDB is a link aggregator what’s your basis for chalking it as unreliable ? Why are you compelled to explain me that you don’t need to know everything the second there’s a rumour? That’s unrelevant to my question. Are you implying something ?

              • Lumidaub@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 days ago

                Imdb can be edited by anyone. I’ve seen so much nonsense on there about who’s going to be on what show. So my basis for calling their information about future productions unreliable is my experience over the decades. I wasn’t implying anything, I simply meant to explain why I don’t have an easy answer for you.