• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Why wouldn’t I want a mobile processor?

    Its in the name. They’re intended for mobile devices. They’re intended to be power-efficient, not powerful or cost-effective.

    You clearly didn’t look at this product at all

    Didn’t really need to. Again, it’s a mobile processor. If they didn’t make concessions to be mobile they wouldnt bother making desktop processors. It’s simply not physically possible for them to meet the same demands of their desktop counterparts, much less for similar pricing.

    Get a 7900X + mobo for $500. Add the extra $200 to your GPU budget. Then save yourself another $700 when you need to upgrade the CPU.

    Also, once again, repairability and upgradability. Does just no one care at all about this?

    • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@sopuli.xyz
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      7950X3D

      the non mobile version costs more than $600, cheapest B650 mobo costs $200

      Get a 7900X + mobo for $500

      minisforum mobo with a a closest equivalent (7945HX which is better than 7900X at lower TDP) costs about less than $500, and it being a mobile chip doesn’t mean it’s actually weaker, it’s just better binning, also it does wonders performance wise while not being constrained to mobile environment, like battery and energy efficiency, while idling at 20W? also the SE version was like $400? it’s an awesome solution for ITX builders