Mark Rober just set up one of the most interesting self-driving tests of 2025, and he did it by imitating Looney Tunes. The former NASA engineer and current YouTube mad scientist recreated the classic gag where Wile E. Coyote paints a tunnel onto a wall to fool the Road Runner.

Only this time, the test subject wasn’t a cartoon bird… it was a self-driving Tesla Model Y.

The result? A full-speed, 40 MPH impact straight into the wall. Watch the video and tell us what you think!

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    “But humans can do it with their eyes!”

    The thing is, RADAR can see things humans can’t. There was a whole article a while back about a Model X that avoided an otherwise unavoidable accident by bouncing radar under the car in front of it and seeing that car slam on the brakes.

    • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      I will point out that if you (or your camera-only driver assist) can’t stop without hitting the car in front of you when they slam on the breaks, then you’re driving too close to them… You really shouldn’t ever put yourself in a position where the person in front of you could cause you to unavoidably hit them.

      That said… Yeah, radar/lidar are far better than camera alone and there’s no good reason not to include them in the sensor suite unless you value profits over lives.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        And I will point out that if the car in front of you isn’t paying attention and rams a stopped car in the middle of the road, you are fucked no matter what.

        • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not if you have the following distance to stop, but point taken: a crash decelerates you faster than breaks can and typical following distances are assuming breaking distance, not hard sudden halts.

          So increase your following distance. It also has the benefit that it makes it easier to see what’s ahead of the car in front of you.

          There’s pretty much no accident that’s unavoidable (barring someone else plowing into you) if you drive defensively enough (assuming good traction and good breaks, but obviously you should increase your following or decrease your speed to compensate for that as well)

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Not if you have the following distance to stop

            Maintaining a stopping distance like that is nigh impossible in a dense urban area. You’d be constantly cut off and causing tons of traffic.

                • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Okay, random Internet person I’ve never met, you clearly know my driving habits and how things go when I’m commuting better than me.

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    I know math, so let’s do some of that:

                    The braking distance of a typical sedan at 70mph is 210 feet. Add another 70 feet for a reaction time and you’re talking about an entire football field of following distance. And that’s assuming you drive a sedan.

                    There’s simply no way you can maintain that in a dense urban environment. Other drivers will cut in front of you like a waterfall. It’s nothing to do with what kind of person you are.