• lemmyng@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    The most likely explanation for requesting a video is to weed out low quality AI-generated “vulnerability” submissions that hallucinate code that doesn’t compile or APIs that don’t exist. In that context a 1 minute video showing that the report is viable is not much to ask for.

    • patatahooligan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Maybe in some cases. But I’ve been requested by Google support to provide a video for a very simple and clear issue we were having. We have a contract with them and we personally brought up the issue to a Google employee during a call. There was no concern of AI generated bullshit, but they still wouldn’t respond without a video. So maybe there’s more to this trend than what you’re theorizing.

      • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I cant beleive google would be so shitty to its paying customers! Can you provide video of this interaction?

        • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          where did you learn to write English?
          Or better, when will you?
          I see you’re getting banned from plenty communities BTW.
          Great.

    • aramis87@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I can understand if the reporter is new, or unknown, maybe submitting a lot of videos at once. The guy from the article is a vulnerability expert that’s been working in that role at Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute’s CERT Coordination Center since 2004. I think he gets a pass on the “submitting fake reports for internet clout” front.