• futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    He really does have a stunted vocabulary. There’s nothing in his head but vanity, greed and pig-ignorance, and a compulsion to be subby to Putin.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hey UK and Australia and New Zealand and other commonwealth nations: you should sign a mutual defense pact, if that’s not already a thing, and it specifically should not include the US. Invite some other euros too, if you can get them.

  • 60d@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    America has been subsidizing Canada

    2024: Canada imports ~$480 billion total from the USA. Divided by 40 million Canadian population, that’s $12,000 for every man, woman, and child spent on American shit.

    USA imports ~$586 billion from Canada. Divided by 400 million population, that’s only $1,465 per capita, and that’s only 1/8th of the amount that Canadians bought from the USA in return.

    ##BUY CANADIAN, BE FAIR!

    You can’t compare apples to apples when one side of the equation has 10 times the population. If we’re trying to be fair, Trumpistan needs to buy 8 times more Canadian shit!

    Tariffs on the Canadian side will be reciprocal and will only serve to make us stop buying Murcan shit, leading to an even bigger Trumped-up deficit and the loss of their biggest, best customer. Likely long-term.

  • sistarena@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I haven’t seen anyone talk about this and I think it needs to be considered. When considering this clip, consider how trumps supporters will see it.

    What we know about Trump supporters:

    • trumps supporters have turned off their critical thinking skills
    • Many of them have below an 8th grade reading level
    • They always have Fox News or another right wing news source turned on - they are addicted to it
    • They already like and trust Trump, and believe him to be some kind of mastermind
    • They are not a majority, but there is a concerning amount of them

    That means what they will get from this clip is:

    • Canada should have already belonged to the US
    • The US has a right to Canada
    • Because trump called Canadians “nasty”, there is a reason to invade Canada, and Canadians deserve it
    • Canada has a lot of resources that the US can use.

    To most people, Trump sounds like an imbecile, but to his supporters, he sounds like he knows what he’s talking about, I personally think he feeds them reasons to be upset without actually making any logical arguments. We all can see that but his supporters can’t. What I’m trying to get at is MAGA’s public opinions about Canada will change because of this interview. This isn’t just bumbling Trump giving a bizarre interview, it’s intentional propaganda to change his viewers’ allegiances.

  • Jona (they/them)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Ohhh you’ve been a nasty girl Canada~

    Come join daddy and help him out, nasty girl that you are, you’re meant to be mine~


    Sorry for my thoughts, I’ll see myself out

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Alternately:

    “We wants it. We needs it. Must have the precious. They stole it from us. Nasty little Canadianses.”

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I really don’t think Canada should take the first shot. Surely there must be some capable people on the US side.

      • Albbi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, and what kind of response would that get? I’m sure Trump’s handlers would love to make him a martyr and have justification for going to war.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Better yet. Let’s make the border between the two countries fluid. Any US state that borders Canada, or any Canadian province that borders the US, can vote to switch countries at any time. Require a large 2/3 majority threshold. Which nation does a better job providing for its citizens? I say we let states/provinces decide for themselves and vote with their feet.

      • Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is actually a really good idea. Make national scale regions fluid so that you can create them and merge them together as desired and make it Democratic. Bolo’bolo suggests something similar

    • ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      He’s awful confident it’s a good plan, so they fully intend to make that a non-issue in elections. We are going to have to fight for our right to vote in the next election.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I mean if it happened it’ll destroy the GOP and conservatives electorally so silver linings.