The BCNDP Really Love Their Cops Harassing the Students.
Bizarre. So most of the dispute was over police presence inside schools. I don’t know what kind of life these parents who want police inside schools lived as kids, but almost all of my friends who had any sort of interaction with this kind of program say they got more trauma than any kind of meaningful assistance.
This is how you get kids to grow up thinking that addiction is a moral failure. How about we bring a priest into the mix too?
I don’t know what kind of life these parents who want police inside schools lived as kids
“Victoria police, three area municipalities, and the Esquimalt and Songhees First Nations have all vocally opposed the decision, citing concerns about gang violence, drugs and sextortion.”
Yes I also read the article
Yes I also read the article
Then you should ask the “Victoria police, three area municipalities, and the Esquimalt and Songhees First Nations have all vocally opposed the decision, citing concerns about gang violence, drugs and sextortion.” directly what lives they have lived to be opposed to the removal of the program instead of ignorantly using subjective evidence to justify the programs removal.
Bizarre. So most of the dispute was over police presence inside schools. I don’t know what kind of life these parents who want police inside schools lived as kids, but almost all of my friends who had any sort of interaction with this kind of program say they got more trauma than any kind of meaningful assistance.
This is how you get kids to grow up thinking that addiction is a moral failure. How about we bring a priest into the mix too?
Addiction is not a moral failure but opposing measures that work to prevent addiction, gang violence, and sex crimes against children is.
Then you should ask […] what lives they have lived to be opposed to the removal of the program instead of ignorantly using subjective evidence to justify the programs removal.
I don’t need to ask because this one I can infer by myself 🤷🏽 there’s an assumption that these programs are in fact bringing significant results in “preventing addiction, gang violence, and sex crimes against children” when in truth, the evidence for these benefits is also subjective evidence ignorantly waved around.
If you’re able to connect the dots, the question I’m asking is exactly that. What kind of lives leads someone to believe on these alleged benefits. The other kind of life, the life that leads someone to not blindly believe that polices on schools is a good thing, I already know, I lived it myself.
Some schools may be justified, but it should not be a BC wide blanket policy.
Maybe? That’s a level of policy scope discussion that I don’t have enough context to have a relevant opinion.
Don’t give them more ideas
