I find after reading a selection of LLM generated poetry/short fiction, you start notice signs of a generated text. It tends be a bit too polished, without any idiosyncrasies and with almost too much consistency in the delivery.
“Polished” is a generous word for it. I think you might be mistaking generic plastic gloss for polish, though. AI writing is so formulaic, it’s like looking at a repeating texture in a video game. It writes lyrics like a five year old, too - very simple, entirely conventional, no creativity. Nothing new.
Would be curious to read the LLM output.
I find after reading a selection of LLM generated poetry/short fiction, you start notice signs of a generated text. It tends be a bit too polished, without any idiosyncrasies and with almost too much consistency in the delivery.
It looks like it’s available in the linked study’s paper (near the end)
Cheers!
“Polished” is a generous word for it. I think you might be mistaking generic plastic gloss for polish, though. AI writing is so formulaic, it’s like looking at a repeating texture in a video game. It writes lyrics like a five year old, too - very simple, entirely conventional, no creativity. Nothing new.
By Bender
I stand corrected, this speaks to my robot soul
I find that LLMs also tend to create very placative, kitschy content. Nuance is beyond them.