• NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Modern militaries are on a different level than “A well regulated Militia” or whatever other 2A BS this is.

    Uh… Afghanistan would like to object?

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      If you’re talking about the Taliban, I’d argue they are a full-blown military which just wasn’t attached to an internationally recognized government for ~2 decades. They had professional soldiers and equipment which would way out-class even the most intense private militia in the US.

    • Nils@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sorry, I don’t follow, care to explain, please.

      Wasn’t the equipment and training they got to resist many invasions over the century, always from external groups? As far as I know, Afghani gun laws are very restrictive and bureaucratic.

        • Nils@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not really sure where you read that statement, it was not what you quoted.

          But I don’t know of a nation that allows civilians to buy the equipment Afghanis used to resist Russia or USA.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Not really sure where you read that statement, it was not what you quoted.

            It is. It literally says “well regulated militia”.

            But I don’t know of a nation that allows civilians to buy the equipment Afghanis used to resist Russia or USA.

            Admittedly I don’t know what equipment they used, so can you give examples?

            • Nils@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah, just infantry, we are talking about rocket launchers, anti-tank grenade launchers(RPG famously), LMG, manpads. Then you have things you can mount on a truck, then you have vehicles itself…

              You also have support from other countries and people, sharing resources, and intelligence. You do not resist USA or Russian with just a bunch of minutemen with walmart weapons. Even harder if they do not care for civilian lives.

              You might have some success disrupting some logistics in the partisan life, but not without a considerable support from modern military and allies.

              well regulated militia

              I might be wrong, but that person’s argument seems to be about the individual owner’s paper on preserving our sovereignty, independent of the calibre size.

              • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 days ago

                Yeah, just infantry, we are talking about rocket launchers, anti-tank grenade launchers(RPG famously), LMG, manpads. Then you have things you can mount on a truck, then you have vehicles itself…

                So admittedly I know next to nothing about this stuff, but you can make RPGs if you’re dedicated. The IRA did it. IEDs will also get you pretty far.

                I might be wrong, but that person’s argument seems to be about the individual owner’s paper on preserving our sovereignty, independent of the calibre size.

                By low-power I meant things you can get legally, so not sniper rifles and shit.

                You also have support from other countries and people, sharing resources, and intelligence. You do not resist USA or Russian with just a bunch of minutemen with walmart weapons. Even harder if they do not care for civilian lives.

                You might have some success disrupting some logistics in the partisan life, but not without a considerable support from modern military and allies.

                The Irish and Algerians did it.

      • Nils@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Do you prefer the Switzerland bureaucracy than ours?

        Also, not sure how that helped them with…

        /Check notes on the Switzerland wars./

        Afghanistan war.

        • rabber@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Well more like nobody dares attack switzerland because it would be impossible. Everyone has a bunker and an assault rifle and they know how to use it.

      • HonoredMule@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The training is what we need to promote, for sure.

        I don’t have a firm enough position on gun control to want it costing us money right now.

        • rabber@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          I would actually support mandatory basic training. As long as they don’t make me cut my hair. Lol

          • HonoredMule@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            Ditto on both points. I’m genuinely struggling with the prospect of having to shorten my beard if I joined the reserves. I’ve been working for years to train/develop it into a distinctive style and I’m not even there yet.

            • rabber@lemmy.caOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 days ago

              My hair is almost down to my ass and I wouldn’t cut it for any reason lol