is there really an advantage to have native Linux support nowadays?

Yes, performance and consistency.

As a dev, you honestly are asking the wrong question. You shouldn’t pride yourself on the corners you’re cutting; you should be using them as an opportunity to expand your knowledge and skillset.

You’re adding to the pile of developer trash every time you rely on abstraction layers to do your job for you. You’re reinforcing an atmosphere where windows developers can get locked-in as much as they want, and it’s up to the Linux community to pick up their (your) slack.

In all honesty, I don’t have high hopes for your game and you really should consider what I’m saying before you release more trash into the world.

I think you should just write it for Linux. Since Windows has that Linux Windows Thing (I don’t remember what it’s called), it’ll probably work there as well as long as you mark it as a dependency.

I cannot go into that site because they don’t comply with the gdpr right to not allow any legitimate interest cookies with one button, hoping I will click agree instead of going through hundreds of vendors and disabling these illegal trackers

Should Vale release a general Steam OS and folk move away from Windows en masse it’s probably going to be worth it. Proton does a great job but a tested and supported Linux build will be better. Some solos do it, but I think it is more based in ideology rather than necessity.

Your time and effort as a solo is going to be limited though, testing and supporting a Linux build is going to be work, and if you want to keep things closed source you are not going to be able to leverage the community in the way open software does.

There might be steps you can take to be more compatible with Proton and/or Steam Deck, which probably would be a good idea, and give you much more effect for your time spend.

I prefer a working Proton build over a untested broken native build. If you can’t afford the time to test the Linux builds, go ahead and just rely on Proton.

Testing on Steam Deck so it can be verified probably does make sense from a marketing standpoint though. Mostly checking that controls work, graphic settings are not too demanding by default and font scaling works properly.

I’ve heard that Steam provides some guidelines to get your games to work well with Proton. I’m not able to find them but maybe they’re behind a developer portal or something. If it works with Proton there’s no reason to aim for a native Linux binary since your time will be better spent elsewhere.

I personally am fine with Proton, the native Linux build usually doesn’t work as well as the Windows one because devs don’t usually care because of smaller market share (or don’t have the time as is often the case with indie studios).

What’s the name of the game? I’ll add it to my wishlist if it sounds like something I’d enjoy.

Also, if I may ask, do a GOG release, I do 90% of my gaming there.

Honestly, I wouldn’t bother.

Linux is a small market and people who buy exclusively native linux games is even smaller. If your game works fine with Proton that’s great.

You’re a solo dev and should pick your battles. I would focus on getting steam deck verified instead, if possible.

Its about practicality.

Even big studios cant handle supporting a native linux version and having it run well while supporting windows versions… which usually ends up with people running the windows version via proton over the native version (Looking at you, Cities Skylines, Truck Simulator games, and more)

So I would say take the easy route and develop for windows with checks to make sure it runs okay in proton, probably a lot less headache and effort than trying to create a seperate native linux codebase.

deleted by creator

If you yourself use/are familiar with Linux and willing to actually test and polish your Linux version to the same standard as your Windows version, then a native Linux version is always appreciated.

However these days, it’s probably not necessary and a lazy afterthought Linux version is like a bad console port, and because we DO have the option to run the Windows version, it’s probably worse than no Linux version at all.

So it really depends on your personal feelings towards Linux, and nobody’s going to judge you for not providing a native version you can’t personally test and support. That’s why we have Proton.

Yes. It’s still needed. Mostly because not everyone using Linux is using a controller or other peripheral input device that just works natively (look at non-steam os handhelds and Bazzite for instance). On smaller screened devices, menus and keyboard specific options can be problematic regardless of other compatibility features.

Wat? SteamOS is Linux…

Please publish to GoG as well. I want to support sites that are DRM free. Also I think it’s smart to give native Linux support to show the industry that Linux is important rather than rely on compatibility tools that may or may not work well for any given game or setup.

Sigh… this is exactly the sort of developer decision people were worried about when Proton first came out, and why some Linux users were opposed to it. Obviously in retrospect the benefits of Proton have been worth it, but those folks wouldn’t be wrong to say “I told you so.”

My take on it is that if you’re not developing Xbox-first (which would imply being forced into DirectX etc.) you should pick libraries that give you cross-platform compatibility “for free” (I know it’s not that simple, but you know what I mean) to begin with. It has to be part of the plan from the beginning (and integrated into your build/test pipeline, etc.); writing the whole game for Windows first and then trying to add Linux support after the fact is a fool’s errand.