Okay. I’ll play along. Who / what country are you going to get to willingly give up their homes and land and everything that is included in that? With what resources will you ensure they are taken care of in… wherever they’re being deported to? Where, by the way, is that? I’m sure you’ve thought that far ahead if you’re serious about this. What will you do if someone doesn’t want to go from their home? I’m certain you have a non - genocidal answer, because you seem pretty sure this is happening peacefully. What about disabled and elderly folks that can’t travel at all let alone move to another country? You wouldn’t be suggesting eugenics and race based large scale ethnic cleansing obviously.
I am not talking about Israel because it is obviously not a libertarian country.
In a libertarian country, people can move to different cities. Since it’s libertarian, those who profit from the move have to pay for it. People will only move if they are paid enough.
No. Obviously that’s my point. Hence all the questions I asked about location… You know, for when you start your racist eugenics based colonization project. The ones you ignored? Remember?
So you want to say that a discussion about libertarianism is mood because there is no such country right now and thus will never be, because not everybody will agree to libertarianism?
Good argument. I guess that’s why Musk is dreaming of mars.
Lol. No. That’s why I am challenging your racist eugenics based dystopia/utopia (depending on frame of reference) idea by asking logistics questions that you appear unable to answer because this is fiction. Please don’t insult me by pretending like that is equivalent to disparaging libertarianism as an ideology or even speaking on the salience of discussing libertarianism as a system for running a country. You’re alleging that this idea of yours is libertarianism, sort of, not me. Which by the way it really isn’t. Libertarianism =/= “I can be racist and take others land in order to avoid having to follow the laws, social and governmental, of the rest of society”. It’s not your “colonizer card”. I don’t even consider myself a libertarian BTW (never have) but this is just too stupid.
Edited to add: this is not a defence of libertarianism or libertarians/libertarian voters. Thats a whole mess I gladly stay away from.
Libertarianism =/= “I can be racist and take others land in order to avoid having to follow the laws, social and governmental, of the rest of society”.
I said moving, not being moved or forced. Is there something wrong with moving if it is not forced?
Okay. I’ll play along. Who / what country are you going to get to willingly give up their homes and land and everything that is included in that? With what resources will you ensure they are taken care of in… wherever they’re being deported to? Where, by the way, is that? I’m sure you’ve thought that far ahead if you’re serious about this. What will you do if someone doesn’t want to go from their home? I’m certain you have a non - genocidal answer, because you seem pretty sure this is happening peacefully. What about disabled and elderly folks that can’t travel at all let alone move to another country? You wouldn’t be suggesting eugenics and race based large scale ethnic cleansing obviously.
I am not talking about Israel because it is obviously not a libertarian country.
In a libertarian country, people can move to different cities. Since it’s libertarian, those who profit from the move have to pay for it. People will only move if they are paid enough.
Okay, what libertarian country is that?
Do I have to tell you that there is none?
No. Obviously that’s my point. Hence all the questions I asked about location… You know, for when you start your racist eugenics based colonization project. The ones you ignored? Remember?
You mean in the “Okay. I’ll play along…” comment?
So you want to say that a discussion about libertarianism is mood because there is no such country right now and thus will never be, because not everybody will agree to libertarianism?
Good argument. I guess that’s why Musk is dreaming of mars.
Lol. No. That’s why I am challenging your racist eugenics based dystopia/utopia (depending on frame of reference) idea by asking logistics questions that you appear unable to answer because this is fiction. Please don’t insult me by pretending like that is equivalent to disparaging libertarianism as an ideology or even speaking on the salience of discussing libertarianism as a system for running a country. You’re alleging that this idea of yours is libertarianism, sort of, not me. Which by the way it really isn’t. Libertarianism =/= “I can be racist and take others land in order to avoid having to follow the laws, social and governmental, of the rest of society”. It’s not your “colonizer card”. I don’t even consider myself a libertarian BTW (never have) but this is just too stupid.
Edited to add: this is not a defence of libertarianism or libertarians/libertarian voters. Thats a whole mess I gladly stay away from.
Let’s stop here. I agree.