fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoomglemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkomglemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoWhat if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month ago… where x is positive. Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoNope, it still works even then.
What if I told you that it works for any number 𝑥 you replace 2 with? (Except for 0 but still working for 𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝑥→0)
… where x is positive.
Otherwise it has an imaginary component and is complex.
Nope, it still works even then.
NOW I get it. Thanks.