JOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-23 days agoSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkSam Altman admits OpenAI has been on the wrong side of history with Open-Sourcelemmy.mlJOMusic@lemmy.ml to Open Source@lemmy.mlEnglish · edit-23 days agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squaresuoko@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoWe have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek… But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
minus-square/home/pineapplelover@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
minus-squareirelephant 🍭@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoJust the weights, training it is another story.
minus-squaresunzu2@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 days agoBetter than others but true “open source”
minus-squareNaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·3 days agoYou can download the model, you do not have the source of the model. It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.
We have plenty of alternatives like Mistral, Gemini, qwen, deepseek…
But none of them is fully open source that you know data they’ve been trained with, right? Maybe only K2 ?
I thought deepseek was open source. Guess not
Just the weights, training it is another story.
Better than others but true “open source”
You can download the model, you do not have the source of the model.
It is similar to releasing a compiled software app as shareware vs publishing your source code.