• Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      It was never a paradox.

      You just need to acknowledge that there is a limit to how tolerant the world can be. Maybe it is at 100% but there is a limit.

      Then you just need to show that tolerance towards e.g. Nazism result in less tolerance than being intolerant to it.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lol. The Paradox of Tolerance is on par with the Libertarian Non-aggression Principle. Purely academic, purely subjective and, ironically, a moral imposition.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        the paradox of tolerance is […] Purely academic

        Yes? That’s kinda the point of a thought experiment ? Do you think the trolley problem is less than “purely academic”? Or that Schrodinger actually put a cat in a box?