• Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    Just ending the game would have been a good way to implement the snitch, tbh. It would have more strategy, more reasons to block the other seeker when you’re behind. If there really had to be extra points, it should have been worth 10 points or something.

    • herrvogel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah that’s the reason quidditch is a dumb fucking sport. You can be wiping the floor with the other team, but if their guy gets lucky and catches the parking lot frog, it’s all for nothing. They’ve won despite having played an objectively much worse game.

      • Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah, I usually go down this same thought process every time I re-read the books. I usually end up at, “Yup, she went out of her way to avoid Quidditch by using feebler and feebler excuses every book.” It’s a shame, because it really could have wound up an exciting part of the series if it was more thought out.

      • Conduit3012@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        You can catch the snitch and still lose. I think the match in the book 4 World Cup ended that way before the Death Eaters showed up.

        The snitch ends the game and awards 150 extra points but doesn’t mean the catching team wins.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It was worth 150 points. The equivalent of 15 goals. Do you mean 100 points and re-release it and continue playing?