• parmesan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Ignoring the fact you havent made any factual arguments, would it be rude to point out your comment history in turn?

    Even basic LLMs can take in context of your entire conversation history. Not that a braindead luddite would actually know anything about AI.

    But ya know, keep being an insufferable cunt because people use a computer program you don’t like, like the fucking loser you are.

    Yup, sure sounds like you have a master in AI and robotics when you have to harass people & call them insufferable cunts for disagreeing with the ethics behind what you apparently study. Obviously you’re definitely not morally grandstanding in the slightest.

    Hope lying on the internet works out for you tho ✌️

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s so fucking predictable at this point.

      You whine about how I argue, so I give you a solid argument, explaining to you the basics of AI imagine generation, how that relates to your argument and why it it means what you said is factually not true.

      Then you just completely fucking ignore it, and look through my replies to find me saying bad words to someone and act like that proves me wrong somehow.

      Because your only other option is to concede you don’t know how AI works and that my point is actually correct. But since that would get in the way of the “AI bad” circlejerk you physically can’t even comprehend the idea.

      when you have to harass people & call them insufferable cunts for disagreeing with the ethics

      And then you even have to lie to make it sound worse. I’m not harassing someone for disagreeing with me about the ethics of AI. Hell I would LOVE to have an actual conversation about AI ethics instead of having people call me a literal Nazi for using generative AI, I insulted a guy because he insulted me.

      Obviously you’re definitely not morally grandstanding in the slightest.

      Litterally I’m not. You guys are the one taking the moral high horse argument here, me refuting it and pointing out your blatant hypocrisy is not grandstanding. All you are doing here is the “I know you are, but what am I?” Arguing that you have been accusing me of.

      Now, if you would kindly either come up with some sort of coherent counter argument to the points I made before, admit you don’t know wtf you’re talking about, or at very least shut the fuck up, that would be great.