Protestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 8 days agoProtestationlemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkProtestationlemmy.mlProtestation@discuss.tchncs.deB to Communism@lemmy.ml · 8 days agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareDessalines@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·8 days agoScientist would absolutely consider themselves newtonians, as his theories have been so thoroughly proven and tested, as to be accepted as fact. The scientific outlook is exactly the opposite of what you describe, which is to build on and extend previous terminology as becomes necessary.
minus-squareDagwood222@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 days agoThat’s a lot of work to avoid dealing the actual issue at hand.
minus-squarebitjunkie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·5 days agoIt looks like a lot of bloviating about nomenclature instead of practical matters.
Scientist would absolutely consider themselves newtonians, as his theories have been so thoroughly proven and tested, as to be accepted as fact.
The scientific outlook is exactly the opposite of what you describe, which is to build on and extend previous terminology as becomes necessary.
That’s a lot of work to avoid dealing the actual issue at hand.
It looks like a lot of bloviating about nomenclature instead of practical matters.