- cross-posted to:
- biodiversity@mander.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- biodiversity@mander.xyz
Humans tend to put our own intelligence on a pedestal. Our brains can do math, employ logic, explore abstractions and think critically. But we can’t claim a monopoly on thought. Among a variety of nonhuman species known to display intelligent behavior, birds have been shown time and again to have advanced cognitive abilities. Ravens plan for the future, crows count and use tools, cockatoos open and pillage booby-trapped garbage cans, and chickadees keep track of tens of thousands of seeds cached across a landscape. Notably, birds achieve such feats with brains that look completely different from ours: They’re smaller and lack the highly organized structures that scientists associate with mammalian intelligence.
Heh. You both make perfect sense. I agree with both of your somewhat opposing viewpoints.
You’re making Lemmy a great place to be.
I am fine with someone arguing that maybe the traits we consider to be a sign of intelligence are defined too narrowly–though in this case it is a really weird take because the article authors would clearly completely agree with this sentiment! I am not so fine with them calling the people they disagree with things like “intellectual supremacists”.
Take it easy. It’s the internet. Hyperbole is a thing.
And what’s the issue with that term? Really. As you say, the article does in fact support this very viewpoint. “Intelligence doesn’t come with an instruction manual. It is hard to define, there are no ideal steps toward it, and it doesn’t have an optimal design”.
That entire comment is specifically being derisive of the article authors, so it is calling them “intellectual supremacists”, rather than agreeing with them.
And that’s ok …
Not really; being as derisive of the authors as that comment was contributed absolutely nothing positive to the conversation.