Nintendo somehow keeps finding a way to make this worse

  • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    When I hit 360 hours in BotW, I asked myself, was this worth a dollar an hour? Yes, yes it was. That was almost 8 years ago, and doesn’t take into account time spent playing other games, or the 7+ years of playtime since.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      $/h is a shitty metric. Some hours are more enjoyable than others, and also time is a resource we spend, just like money, not something we’re gaining, so it taking time is a negative. Enjoyment/$ is the metric to use, or maybe (enjoyment/h)/$.

      $/h is a marketing term. It isn’t a term consumers should bother with. It’s what has lead to boring over-inflated games that waste your time doing things that don’t matter and aren’t fun.

      • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        Enjoyment/$ is the metric to use, or maybe (enjoyment/h)/$.

        Or, as I stated, “worth the money.” I’m not interested in turning it into a hard formula, universally transferable. As you noted, there’s too many variables. I was stating that the money was well spent. That’s it.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          OK, but you didn’t say that. You said worth the $/h, which is a common metric people use but is less than worthless.

          $/h is useful because it isa universally transferable measure. Enjoyment is not, but is actually what we care about.

          I’m just trying to work to remove $/h as something people discuss, because it’s ruined so many games.