squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to LGBTQ+@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 24 days agoUK Supreme court rules legal definition of a woman excludes trans womenwww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkUK Supreme court rules legal definition of a woman excludes trans womenwww.thepinknews.comsquirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone to LGBTQ+@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square39fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: globalnews@lemmy.zip
minus-squarezout@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up0·24 days agoAs an out of touch, middle aged, white guy, why do we need a legal definition of a woman?
minus-squareZorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·24 days ago Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.
minus-squareWytch@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·24 days agoTo facilitate punching down, as bullies do
minus-squareRedSnt 👓♂️🖥️@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-223 days agoIt’s to restrict the rights of citizens. It’s classic culture war bs.
As an out of touch, middle aged, white guy, why do we need a legal definition of a woman?
To facilitate punching down, as bullies do
It’s to restrict the rights of citizens. It’s classic culture war bs.