• merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    Arsenal typically plays in a 4-3-3 that becomes a 4-4-2 in defence. It’s almost always Odegaard that goes up top with the striker when they switch to that 4-4-2.

    Because of that, I don’t know if it would work very well to have what you’re describing, basically a 4-4-2 in attack, that becomes a different 4-4-2 in defence.

    Also, right now the midfield 3 is basically a #6, a left #8 who gets forward sometimes, but becomes part of a midfield defence when the ball is turned over (typically Rice) and a #8/#10 whose defensive contribution is mostly pressing opposing CBs and GKs (Odegaard). If you replace Partey with a player who sometimes plays as a striker, you might get caught out with nobody screening the back line. If you made Merino the left #8 and Rice the #6, it’s less risky, but then you lose out on Rice’s forward runs.

    • timmytbt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      23 days ago

      No. Was still talking 4-3-3 just with Trossard dropping deep sometimes and Merino stepping up to fill that space.

        • timmytbt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          23 days ago

          Nah, more like how Havertz played as the left 8. Often pushing forward into the centre forward position, particularly for the long ball, with the “striker” (Trossard/Jesus) dropping in. I mean, who knows what Mikel has up his sleeve. I just see this as being less disruptive to the relationships that already exist than moving someone other than Rice into the 6.