• bequirtle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    If police are gonna shoot babies for shoplifting, then I’m not gonna report shoplifting :P

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        No. No you wouldn’t, that’s a lie, you just now said you disagreed with that concept entirely.

        You literally just said the opposite of that. The exact opposite of that. You just now said that stealing is always wrong and should always be stopped.

        • SouthernShao@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          It should always be stopped. There’s a difference between what is objectively moral and what is subjectively moral.

          Theft is objectively immoral.

          Stealing to feed your children is subjectively moral and objectively immoral.

          Both can be true at the same time.

          The reason why theft is objectively moral is because you would never want anyone to violate your will and thus, you should never want to violate the will of another.

          • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            Save us both time, just say you love licking boots.

            Also, the concept of synderesis, which is what you’re advocating, is theocratic social programming to appease some fake afterlife rules from a fake god. It purposely removes the idea of situational and circumstantial areas of action and implies all actions have one singular miral interpretation. You’re carrying water for Abraham with this bullshit. Your concept of faux morality can rot.