Do you think civil engineers would build unsafe bridges because “stakeholders” told them to? No, because they would go to fucking jail.
sure the first iteration of the bridge would be up to spec as they need to be inspected first to be approved. So the Stakeholders would do anything to get it done, buuuuuuut maybe not with the best materials and the best engineers/workers but certainly on time in mind.
But afterwards? when it comes to maintaining the bridge; eeeh, its good enough, here a patchwork; who cares if there are potholes everywhere, you can still use it right?
We are a fucking disgrace. We need software liability laws because apparently we can’t stand up for ourselves and our profession.
Can’t really stand up when CEOs constantly lay off teams. So why would one guy who stands up for what is just and right matters to them?
sure the first iteration of the bridge would be up to spec as they need to be inspected first to be approved. So the Stakeholders would do anything to get it done, buuuuuuut maybe not with the best materials and the best engineers/workers but certainly on time in mind.
But afterwards? when it comes to maintaining the bridge; eeeh, its good enough, here a patchwork; who cares if there are potholes everywhere, you can still use it right?
Can’t really stand up when CEOs constantly lay off teams. So why would one guy who stands up for what is just and right matters to them?