• vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You seem to be operating under the misplaced assumption that Trump’s goal with the tariffs was to actually bring manufacturing back to the US or improve the US economy in any way. It’s understandable if you haven’t paid very close attention to Trump over the past 9 years. But whenever thinking about him or his policies, you have to keep one thing top of mind: Trump is a habitual liar who only cares about his own personal wealth and power.

    He’s not trying to bring manufacturing back to the US or improve the US economy. He’s doing market manipulation to increase his wealth and that of those who helped get him into power. He doesn’t give a shit about you or me or any of the rest of us. He couldn’t care less if the US crumbled into dust tomorrow, so long as he’s still on top.

  • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Yes but you, like everyone I seem to talk to these days, is under the false impression that Trump isn’t a complete idiot who literally thinks tariffs are the solution to all problems. It’s more comforting to think there’s some massive conspiracy by Russia or that it’s a ploy to make money off the stock market, but I truly believe that Trump actually thinks tariffs will magically fix the economy and his reactions to the backlash are legitimate shock that so many people and the markets don’t agree. Yes Russia does stand to gain from this, but they don’t need to pull the strings when the guy in charge is innovating economic policy so stupid that a smart person would have trouble even imagining it.

    Trump decisions make more sense when you realize he is actually stupid as fuck and there’s no hidden chess moves or anyone pulling the strings from the shadows. There is nobody at the wheel who is actually competent even if they’re evil. This is all just the whims of a complete moron who is probably also going a bit senile as well.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s a thousand better ways to handle both tariffs and free trade. We fucked up the latter with NAFTA (and CAFTA), where the EU got it right. Bringing jobs home with tariffs isn’t something you just snap your fingers and do, shit takes a long time to re-align, it would’ve made a lot more sense to have it go through the legislature and say “hey, we’re starting out at a 10% tariff on this stuff we want to bring home, and we’re going to ratchet it up +2% every year until Congress doesn’t pass the law again.” Instead, we’ve got the most volatile president in history implementing tariffs by fiat: 10% 20% actually none actually 10% actually 125% for real this time. Yeah, in this situation, the best play is to just try and wait dumbass out, because there’s a non-zero chance he wakes up tomorrow and declares tariffs woke.

  • payhn@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You can either convince people with a carrot to do what you want and hope they will comply or make them comply with a sharp expensive stick 🤷‍♂️ Orange man doesn’t seem to like carrots

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The problem is if you hit everyone with a stick sometimes they just leave and you are left just playing with your carrot by yourself

  • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    And giving more tax breaks to companies that stay and sell in the US?

    that’s technically what tariffs do. topologically, it’s the same thing: using policy to give a price advantage to domestic producers.

    talk about shopping locally and so forth.

    talk gets one only so far. when those numbers start to chomp into the household budget, everyone forsakes the “made in…” label in favour of the price tag.

    • Thavron@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      IMO this is the major flaw. Tariffs could work in practice, but you’d have to announce them way ahead of time to give local businesses time to fill in the gap. Otherwise you’ll get what happens now.

      • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The first flaw is not discussing things with the people in charge of tariffs such as the secretary of treasury.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Of course. Republicans hate paying taxes. you can give back taxes to companies by giving them more money. You can even “reverse tariff” by subsidizing products that you want to be cheaper than the same imported products from China.

    Tariffs are one of the worst ways to deal with this type of problem.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Tariffs have been the one major actual policy position rattling around in Trump’s empty skull since at least 1988. He fucking loves the idea of tariffs, for some reason.

    • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Smart, specific targeted tariffs paired with grants/incentives to American companies to foster local production of critical goods (think CHIPS Act) can be a good thing, if they are done in such a way that it doesn’t send an entire industry/market into financial shock.

      Like, if you want to onboard silicon wafer manufacturing (as a prime example); you would announce a small tariff to start off with, and a clear road-map of it increasing over time - allowing time for companies to build the necessary infrastructure and manufacturing capabilities onshore.

      Once the industry has settled and matured, those tariffs could begin to be slowly pared back to ensure that free-market competition continues to keep prices in check.

      But this would only work in an actual free-market economy, and not in the oligopoly-in-a-trenchcoat that currently exists in the states.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sure, but that reasonable and nuanced idea has nothing to do with what Trump’s position on tariffs has always been. He’s just a dipshit that doesn’t understand the difference between microeconomics and macroeconomics, or that the entire economy of of a country that controls its own currency (and especially one that controls the world’s reserve currency) doesn’t work the same way as an individual household or business.

        • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Oh, absolutely!

          My morning caffeine clearly hadn’t kicked in because I stupidly forgot to circle back round to that point. 🤦🏻‍♂️

          Ultimately, my biggest worry is that Trump’s absolute piss-poor understanding and implementation of tariffs has very likely ‘poisoned the well’ to the point that they could probably never be successfully implemented in our lifetime by an actual competent Government - assuming the US ever gets another chance to elect one ever again.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Ultimately, my biggest worry is that Trump’s absolute piss-poor understanding and implementation of tariffs has very likely ‘poisoned the well’ to the point that they could probably never be successfully implemented in our lifetime by an actual competent Government

            Well, it’s not as if they had much chance of happening anyway, given the neoliberal status quo for decades before that, so… 🤷

  • tenchiken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Tariff = more money into Fed govt. -> funnel money from Fed govt into his and his friends pocket.

    This is a faster way to get money out of the populace and into his accounts.

  • Death_Equity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    A salient question is why Democrats, like Pelosi, wanted reciprocal tariffs a couple decades ago and then changed their mind.