• Oderus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s under 13% so while he’s the largest single owner, he still doesn’t own an enormous amount. He could easily be bought out.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        For a publicly traded company? Yes that’s an enormous amount in that context.

        Isn’t it?

      • Oderus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t know what the threshold would be… but it would have to be over 50%. If I own 13% of my house, I wouldn’t say I own an enormous amount. I would I own 1/8th my house, which is pretty meagre.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Your house isn’t a publicly traded company. That makes a big difference in this context.

          • Oderus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Only if you really want it to be different is it different. The reality is, it’s not. Words have meaning and 1/8th is not enormous. It’s literally a small fraction of the total.