"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agoTRUCKIN'lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkTRUCKIN'lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoHe could be into inflation play.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoDon’t kinkshame them for self-foie-gras-play
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoI’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoWouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?
He could be into inflation play.
Don’t kinkshame them for self-foie-gras-play
I have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
I’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
Wouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?