• douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s the difference between knowing how to market and knowing how to actually build shit.

    Turns out, in our modern society, the former is a far more valuable skill than the latter.

    Just bullshit your way until you get enough money and resources to actually hire people who know what they’re doing and can build the thing.

    It sucks

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      One guy I used to work with (long before LLMs) built a website for his company and listed a bunch of software there for sale. Except he hadn’t built any software product yet. Once someone contacted him about buying one of the products, then he would build it.

    • joulethief@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      until you get enough money and resources to actually hire people who know what they’re doing and can build the thing.

      Has this ever happened? I though the way to go was enshittification of an already inferior product

      • drkt@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Blitzscaling. The enshittification comes once the userbase is stable and the company can’t keep bullshitting investors about possible future gains so they have to start cutting.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Turns out, in our modern society, the former is a far more valuable skill than the latter.

      that was knows and loudly displayel by all the apple fanbois and Jobs

  • django@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    LibreOffice has the ability to use regex in search&replace, MS Office does not. So why should i use a copy of the inferior product?

  • sbird@retrofed.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    LibreOffice is an awesome piece of kit! On setup, they let you select the “tabbed” UI if you prefer something closer to MS office.

    Collabora Office is another one that seems neat, have not used it before though. OnlyOffice has weird Russian ties and GPL incompatible licensing shenanigans, I would avoid them for the most part. WPS Office has the best compatibility with MS Office files on Linux I think, but it’s closed-source so not great either. There’s always running a VM / dual booting if you must use MS Office.

    Honestly, MS office files have worked fine on LibreOffice, the only big issue I’ve found is that translucent images are a little broken when going from Impress to PowerPoint (all images share the same opacity for some reason?)

      • sbird@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I haven’t used any of them in ages, I know Collabora is focused on their online suite. Looking at OnlyOffice’s website, they are positioning themselves as an “AI-first” office suite (the LLM tools have been changed to be optional and installed separately since a recent update, but still a bad look)

        And WPS Office was always owned by a Chinese company and continues to be closed-source, so no changes there. Again, the same sort of “AI-first” stuff on their homepage, yikes

    • axh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      On setup, they let you select the “tabbed” UI

      On setup it asks you to select one of four UIs, some of them are missing features. Once I spent almost an hour trying to solve a problem, but it turned out it was unsolvable in my UI. I changed the UI and found a solution in a moment.

      Don’t get me wrong, I love the fact that OpenOffice exists, but their UI needs a lot of work

      • sbird@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        LibreOffice, not OpenOffice. I believe LibreOffice was forked from OpenOffice, and the latter hasn’t had any updates in ages.

        I imagine that the UI you selected was the one of the “compact” or “single toolbar” options? It is a little confusing that some of the one functions disappear with those, it would be helpful if it was listed which ones were missing

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I had thought that OpenOffice was the one that “looked modern and familiar” while libreoffice is the good one but lools older.

          • sbird@retrofed.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            You’re confusing OpenOffice (dead project pretty much, hasn’t seen updates in ages) with OnlyOffice (the Russian one with the licensing shenanigans and “AI first” stuff, UI is M365-like and very similar to the LibreOffice “Tabbed” UI)

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      In my experience, MS Office files tend to have fewer compatibility problems on LibreOffice than on MS Office after the next update.

      • sbird@retrofed.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s never that MS Office files don’t work on LibreOffice (formatting is a little different but almost never broken), it’s always files exported from LibreOffice that MS Office misreads (because Microsoft can’t be bothered to follow standards are anti-competitive)

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Can’t be bothered makes them sound lazy. It’s a deliberate method of squashing all competitors. If you can’t send a document to someone else who usrs MS Office and have it appear the same, then you’re going to need to use MS Office. Libre has been calling them out on this for years.

  • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The clone is perfect though, vibe coded or not: as it doesn’t work it’s obviously a 1:1 copy that’s just accurately mimicking the original…

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Man that sentence was hard for me to parse – browsing threadiverse too early in the tye morning

  • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    A friend just sent me a video of someone explaining that this vibe coded PhotoShop version exists and it should be 1:1 on par or something. I dont know if that even makes sense, just manually checking and testing every single feature will take more then the time they claim they have spent on it lol

    • sbird@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Apparently it looks identical to MS Office, so it isn’t “better” than MS Office or LibreOffice in a functional sense (arguably less so since it’s probably very buggy code)

      I wouldn’t say it’s people (normal people would be using MS Office or LibreOffice most likely) excited that it’s LLM generated, though some AI Bros probably are, I imagine some outlets are promoting this to sell whatever the new model is these days. And when there is a lot of news around a topic, it’s covered by more and more people (something about all press is good press here)

  • lagg_mine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only reason we want a clone of ma office is because it’s the standard, not because it’s good…