You must log in or register to comment.
11 you aren’t stuck in traffic, you are the traffic
But I go only at times where there are no jams. So I am no traffic (according to your logic)
where did i say you’re only traffic when you’re stuck in it?
Speed cameras do not save lives.
Reducing speed saves lives. That is better accomplished by more intelligent road design than a system that may be disabled, requires specific conditions, can be obscured, and relies on consequences issued a substantial time past the infringing event.
Narrower, winding roads with plants close to the lane edges will have an immediate effect on slowing traffic. Slapping a camera on a 6 lane throughway and dropping the speed limit by 5-10mph will do jack shit aside from make the municipality more money.
Fuck spy cams.
A good speeding camera will only take imagery when the radar/lidar detects a speeding incident, which makes it different from an ALPR that takes pictures constantly and can be used to track folks who aren’t actively breaking the law for the sake of tracking them. That being said, there is a bit of a “trust me, bro” aspect to that part of the system design, so I do get the distrust
Spy cameras are bad. However, police arbitrarily enforcing the law is also really bad. So is no enforcement at all. So I’m not sure what’s the least bad.
Maybe as the other person said a camera system that only records the minimum information, and can’t be used for other purposes.
Ich will es nicht nachsehen, ich will es als Teil der Allgemeinbildung in jedermenschs Kopf prügeln.
Fuck promoting government surveillance cameras. Make streets pedestrian safe. It’s doable.
Speed cameras ≠ ALPR
They definitely do.
Explain/Show proof how they are equal.
9 is a best guess, over a harsh truth.
11 - you don’t ever really need a car to go beyond 80 mph
12 - manufacturers can actually cap vehicle speed by design but choose not to
