• CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    That would be fantastic. An even more right wing POS to split the vote in an already ultra right wing riding.

  • Archangel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This is just bad running against worse. Everyone loses, no matter which one wins.

    • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Third option, very unlikely but 91 people register in the by election and 4 of them are named Pierre one with a French last name starting with P.

      The ballot is alphabetical and he is bunched in between the other PPs, the real PP stands up but no one in Alberta knows French much or how to read because education is underfunded so they elect the independent Pierre Pondulac

    • ninthant@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I remember coworkers telling me in 2015 that they hoped Trump would win the RNC nomination because he’d be easier to beat

      CPC is pretty awful but PPC is much worse. We do not want these people in parliament.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s not at all the same.

        This would give the PPC one seat total, and deprive the CPC of their current leader.

        Your analogy is actually much more similar to PP WINNING the seat. The Liberals being so happy to call a special election is BECAUSE they LIKE keeping PP, the guy they just beat the leader of the CPC. If the libs drag their feet to give challengers the space to make a play for CPC leadership, they’re rolling the dice. They’re choosing the devil they know and beat. Their bet is they think PP is a guy they can beat again.

    • Corngood@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Less far fetched but equally hilarious would be to get Singh and Pedneault in there.

      They could make their campaigns all about being ‘the best loser’, ‘we deserve a second chance’, or something like that.

  • SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s actually something interesting.

    I’m a little conflicted because Maxime is a real piece of shit but Pierre losing twice would be kinda amazing. This is pretty much the only way Pierre has any significant potential of losing the by-election.

    • AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Bernier is awful, but a win would likely result in the PPC gaining strength in the next election, which would pull far right voters away from the CPC and weaken them while keeping the far right on the fringes. That sounds good to me. I don’t think it’s at all likely that he’ll run against Poilievre and win, but it would be fine by me.

    • potate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I suggested Maxime Bernier running to some friends as a joke. Bernier is AWFUL - but it would be hilarious to see Poilevre lose again. Poilevre is trying to avoid that risk by picking an extremely right leaning district - so no risk from the left, but farther right? Rural Albertans have a history of not forgiving screw-ups…