• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      “What about that time NATO attacked genocidaires in the process of committing genocide on another country and stopped as soon as the genocidaires withdrew?”

      Yeah, I guess that was pretty horrific.

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Are you saying NATO in order to stop a genocide, they killed the side who started the genocide? Well that sounds exactly like a genocide to me!

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not pretending that was a genius move from NATO or even that it was justified, but you didn’t have to read that far…

      The bombings continued until an agreement was reached that led to the withdrawal of the Yugoslav Army from Kosovo

      • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        What about

        NATO launched its campaign without the UN’s approval, stating that it was inter alia a humanitarian intervention.

        and the fact that Yugoslavia had more than 1000 died and more than 5000 injured, while NATO’s loss was negligible?