• frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Abrams works unreasonably well against other tanks. There is a question about how any tank stands up to drones, though.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      The reason they’re continuing to buy them is that the assembly line needs to maintain a minimum level of production, otherwise all the staff and expertise and tooling and machinery goes away. And then whenever they are actually needed, it becomes impossible to scale up, because everyone who knows how to make the fucking things has gotten another job or retired.

      It’s not plug-and-play. It’s frustrating, and yes, wasteful, but if you actually do give a shit about defense policy, there is a specific logistical reason for why this is done.

      • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        If you read that article, that point was made.

        And they said, you could maintain the minimum level of production by foreign owners alone.

      • opus86@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I ran across some of the most incompetent, idiots in the military. They kept re-enlisting every four years because they wouldn’t make it on the outside. The problem was they had been in long enough to hold the middle ranks.

        • P00ptart@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          They’re not talking about the military, they’re talking about tank production and the reasoning behind keeping the factories open and running.