• altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Some search queues return me pages of word-to-word copypastes of one ‘original’ AI gen article. On top of existing power-googling, you need not to include words that are particularly popular in slop. It brought a need to rewrite a queue a couple of times before it gets to the point.

    They learnt on the worst examples of SEO, and then intertwined with it.

      • altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It depends, that’s why I said it requires reruns with some slight modifications. When I was looking for a FOSS or at least Linux-friendly software for some live video visuals manipulation, VJ and everything with ‘video’ triggered a wave of slop, but ‘projecting software’ lead me to a rabit hole of actual list of choices, albeit most of them were paid, proprietary and Windows only.

        It’s counter to my previous expirience of including certain words to narrow the search: now I watch for what keywords bring most AI articles and drop\change them.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Fair enough. My email signature used to include a sentence that included words like “bloody” and “slaughter” since gmail didn’t advertise alongside notifications of a tragedy. I doubt they’re so conscientious these days, though.