Something big is happening, as Reddit seems to have purged literally every NSFW sub they know. Reason is always “unmoderated” despite some of the banned subreddits being fully moderated.

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    r/transgender_surgeries wasn’t porn. It was a community outlet for results so people could understand what to expect. Queer folk always get swept up with porn, cishet only see us as a “kink” and assume our existence is entirely sexual.

    It’s fucking infuriating.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      You… see who’s in charge, right? Republicans always target LGBTQ+ folks for “pornographic” violations.

    • dontbelasagne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a shame. I’m not trans. I’m a cis male and I have no desire to be female. But I live in a very trans friendly community and as such I have many trans friends and they need outlets. I joined a meetup group which inadvertly became a trans safe space (original topic was anime) and many trans people just joined as it was the one space where they weren’t judged. We just did it in the way of anime, like their only safe space is something not trans releated and this is despite living in a friendly city. I will be an ally to all my trans friends and support them in this time of need.

    • dumples@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Queer folk always get swept up with porn, cishet only see us as a “kink” and assume our existence is entirely sexual.

      This is the whole point of these porn bans is to remove queer people from the internet. The porn cover just allows it to happen. So whenever you see anything about porn bans think queer ban first and then some porn removal that comes right back

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The old ass fascists trying to hold together their plutocracy suppress anything that goes against their patriarchal values.

        Even looking at it as a fetish, trans porn has been skyrocketing in popularity

        https://www.pornhub.com/insights/transgender-searches

        And this terrifies right wingers

        The current patriarchy sees non-binary people as a threat to their heirachies. If the line between man and woman gets blurred then we start questioning why we aren’t all actually equal, and that leads to us removing them from power.

        • dumples@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Really anything that shows or hints that any part of their “natural” order is something created. Gender is a big one but anything

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        it’s telling that they target trans content; but leave gay content alone.

        • dumples@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          They knew that their attacks on gay people weren’t as popular as they once were so they are taking the exact same tactics and language and moving it towards Trans people. It both predictable and sad at the same time

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            it’s sad, but expected from conservatives; the real sadness is an “ally” like biden who didn’t enact the equal right amendment that would help protect trans people from the legal version of this shit and then very publicly pretended that he did.

            • nomy@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why are people still talking about Biden? He’s not the president and I thought we all agreed he was a feeble brained old centrist who needed to gtfo the way. Living rent free etc.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                The damage he allowed to happen doesn’t magically disappear once he left office

                • nomy@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The damage they’ve all allowed going back decades. He’s bought and paid for just like every other pol. None of them are on our side and shouldn’t be treated like they are.

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They lost the chance to scapegoat the gays after they failed to in the 80s during the AIDS epidemic

          Now there’s too many gay people in the population to keep them down.

          Once we get over this hurdle the same will be true for Trans people.

          • clif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Now there’s too many gay people in the population to keep them down.

            Well if we made more gay people, let’s just make more trans people. Problem solved!

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              let’s just make more trans people. Problem solved!

              This is literally what right wingers accuse trans people trying to engage with kids in public of doing. Like trans story time, or trans teachers. That they’re going to trans their children, like it’s some kind of vampire curse.

    • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I’m currently discussing with people about mirroring it somewhere on lemmy, but there is also Transbucket which already exists.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well it is genitals but the purpose is entirely different. I don’t agree with it but I can at least see the logic.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        By that “logic”, all obgyn’s are sex workers. It’s shit justification for bigotry and shouldn’t be given any credence whatsoever.

        • billwashere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Not sure I follow the logic since an OBGYNs job is not get you off.

          If they are banning NSFW images, then that’s why.

          Like I said the purpose of those images in the trans subreddits serve an educational purpose. But you probably shouldn’t be viewing it at work. If they are banning nudity, that’s nudity.

          Like I said I don’t agree with the ban hammer, but it’s consistent. However, in my opinion, all it should be left as is regardless of the purpose.

          • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            since an OBGYNs job is not get you off.

            Neither is trans people posting the results of surgery.

            This entire line of thinking is contradictory, nonsensical and unhelpful.

            • billwashere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I was replying to comment the “OBGYNs are sex workers” comment. Tran surgery pics are very useful and not porn.

              If you can’t follow that logic I’m not sure what to do.

    • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, ffs. #notallcishet? I don’t get how people who are being oppressed and all lumped together under one description (which you all definitely are) can be so nonchalant throwing around broad strokes like that.

      • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You got a problem with trans people? No? Then it wasn’t talking about you. Christ, is that hard to understand?

        When a group of people makes an “us vs them” against a minority, it forces the minority to use that language back. As a cishet person, your identity is being used as a weapon to harm trans people regardless if you’re doing anything. Ignorance of the minorities plight can be weaponized to do more harm and that ignorance can be shielded through appeals to normalcy and tradition.

        When you respond to that language with “not all cishet people” you signal that your support is contingent on you not losing anything (your ignorance is one of the things you can lose). Which can and will be used to weaponize more harm against the minority group.

        • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I realize that I’m outnumbered here and that this is apparently an unpopular opinion, but nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

          You’ve both been quite rude to me and I’m done engaging you, but that’s the full extent of my point and I’m unconvinced by your rebuttals.

          Ciao now 🫡

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            nobody is forcing anyone to say “all x are y” because someone else is (I agree, in bad faith) doing the same thing.

            Legal documents are being made to say that all x (transgender individuals) are now y (the wrong gender) because someone else (the government) is making them say so.

            • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve never disputed that. I don’t know how reiterating that fact in any way supports the idea that it “forces” transgender individuals to use the same language to describe “all cishet” people.

              That was my point. It always has been.

              If I were visually impaired and protesting unsuccessfully for better accessibility in my work environments, I can’t imagine why I would make a claim in any capacity including the language “all sighted people”.

      • Draces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Lol was that hashtag ironic? You know “not all men” is frequently referenced as a critique about men who can’t hear criticism of gender equality because “not all men”? As a cishet dude: calm down, their point is valid and your reaction is cringe

  • misterhuh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They have been coming back. /drugs being one that is back. Don’t know wtf happened, but glad I’m here.

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Spez: “Daddy Elon wants me to get rid of all the twitter critical and trans related subs. How can I do it without it being too obvious?”

    Snoo Lackey: “Easy. What we’ll do is ban a load of morally grey subs like porn and drug related ones along with the twitter critical and trans ones. Then, when the predictable uproar kicks off, we’ll wait awhile then announce it was all a terrible mistake and we’ll reactivate all the porn ones. We just won’t reactivate the twitter critical or trans ones. Because lets be honest - no one really cares and as long as the simpletons have their wank bank back, they’ll neither notice nor care either!”

    Spez: “Brilliant!”

    • vortic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Good theory, but it looks like they all came back including the transgender related subs.

  • Archmage Azor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Reddit is preparing to surrender to somebody who does not want NSFW content on their site in an attempt to appease advertisers. Possibly Musk.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s funny because I watch zero NSFW content on Reddit or Lemmy.

      Spoiler

      Have way better sources for that, you know 😏

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        30 days ago

        it really is funny. furries have the best image board for the worst content. (or not, depending on how you see it i suppose)

        furries stay winning, what can i say.

  • whytho@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    this was literally why i still kinda used reddit. welp hello lemmynsfw!

  • molave@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t care about NSFW subs per se, but they’re useful canaries in the coal mine. If they’re gone gone, it’s a fine indicator of what’s about to come next.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, your canaries are already long dead. It’s long been a process when Reddit admins don’t want a sub to exist but it isn’t actually breaking any rules to laser focus on the moderators, ban them the moment they have an excuse, immediately ban the sub for being unmoderated, refuse to give it to a new mod via reddit request and ban any replacement subs for recreating a banned sub. Hell, r/GamingCircleJerk has been laughing about some right wing gaming memes sub having that done to it just a few weeks ago.

      They only care about it not looking like they are just nuking subs they don’t like is because they don’t want to scare off other users who might get antsy about having a community under those sorts of capricious admins.

      This sounds a lot like an automation of that process that misfired. That they were all specifically banned for being “unmoderated” is what jumps out to me as telling.

    • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m against the ban, but I also don’t want that gooning here. Although that’s what drives like half of the internet so maybe it’s a good thing for the fediverse.

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Man, like I’ll welcome new people, but I don’t want all flooded with porn. I already had to block a bunch of communities/ profiles, and I’ll have to work more to fix my feed. Having said that

      Give me your tired, your goons, Your huddled masses yearning to goon free, I guess.

      • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Try jerboa, you can just block the nsfw instance instead of doing it piecemeal. Total game changer. (Some of the other apps probably have this functionality but I don’t know which.)

        • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I do this in sync as it is. Just saying if a shitload of reddit refugees come here and my feed becomes 90% full of porn, I’ll likely have a few more to ban.

          • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            As far as I can tell, you can only block communities in sync which is why you’re having to do it one by one. Jerboa you can just block the whole NSFW instance, one and done.

          • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I didn’t want other NSFW stuff blocked, just porn. When I was originally signing up it seemed like NSFW was being treated as an all or nothing for most instances. Idk if it’s changed or if I just needed to look harder.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              What’s an example of NSFW that you want to see that is banned by instances banning porn? Which instances are you referring to?

              • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Idk it was like 2 years ago. I just remember looking through fediverse guides and instances were labeled as either allowing NSFW content or not, no nuance. I didn’t dig into whether the specific instances were defederated from lemmynsfw nor did I even know to look for that at the time.

                There’s not that much NSFW stuff that isn’t porn but I come across it occasionally. Usually jokes, sometimes people will also be very cautious and mark shit that isn’t really. I prefer to be largely unconstrained with what comes across my feed, just don’t care for the random puss intermingled.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not an admin or anything, but there was a recent meta post about this topic. A lot of NSFW and political stuff is restricted but not blocked. All that means is that it won’t show in any feed unless you actually subscribe to the community. If you subscribe it will show in the all-feed like normal. I think it’s a good middle ground.

    • Ethalis@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      As far as I remember they weren’t monetizing NSFW subs, so I guess their reasoning is that banning them reduces server costs while not impacting their ads revenue.

      Now what will be interesting is to see how much of Reddit’s userbase was there at least partly for the porn, and how many users will leave Reddit altogether because of this move

    • kn33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s what it looks like. There are a lot of NSFW subs that didn’t get banned, and some that got banned that weren’t NSFW like /r/narcissisticabuse. All marked as for “being unmoderated”. If they were actually banning NSFW subs, you’d think they’d say so.

    • Amju Wolf@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be fair I don’t think that many people go to Reddit for porn. With Tumblr it seemed almost exclusive. But it’s still an odd move.

      • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Porn on Reddit used to be good but has been awful since the rise of OnlyFans. Now almost every post on porn subreddits is someone shilling their onlyfans using the same 5 second tease clips across dozens of tenuously related subreddits. If the exodus happens to Lemmy, that is what it will be here.

        OF killed good amateur porn

          • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            it was at the time i wrote that comment (hence the screenshot). Reddit since came out and said there was an error. most of the banned subreddits are now back up

        • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          OF killed good amateur porn

          As I have seen it pointed out, it’s not just that, although it is a huge part of it. Another, sadly, is that there was so much uncontrolled porn floating around the internet, much of it was pretty fucked up - involuntarily filmed and/or published without consent, not traceable, even with very unclear ages, etc., etc.

          So as a secondary effect, that I think is highly positive, most sites also just don’t allow for non-verified content, or at least are much better at removing anything remotely suspicious. That leaves the OF stuff as the main non-studio-produced source, as it allows for easy, professional verifications.