• terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    While I do think that FEMA is neccissary and that we need a nationalized safety blanket for those that get effected by natural disasters I’m not entirely in disagreement with a complete overhaul of FEMA. FEMA does suck ass and is way too bureaucratic. Anyone remember the shit show that was Hurricane Katrina recovery? And if you do you most likely don’t remember Hurricane Rita that hit the western part of Louisiana just a few weeks later. A much less populated area of the state but hit just as hard with significant loss of homes, several communities being washed completely away and a rediculus amount of costal wetland losses due to salt water intrusion. Still, New Orleans was devestated, lives were lost, FEMA severely dropped the ball on too many fronts to count, and the city to this day has remnants of abandoned buildings and houses that have been empty nearly 20 years later… FEMA trailers, the reselling of FEMA trailers, hundreds of people that lost what money they got from FEMA due to sheisty contractors who just took their checks and never did a damn thing. All of this either directly or indirectly due to the organization being a shit show.

    On top of this the majority of the homes that are rebuilt are in questionable areas and due to climate change will be in danger of repeating this cycle in the next 5 years. The FEMA maps can go fuck off, as some one who has worked in a field that delta with them on a daily bases, they often times do not take into consideration the realities of flooding possibilities under climate change and are heavily influenced by insurance companies and other political entities.

    On the flip side, I know many people that would have been homeless with out those FEMA checks. The money injected into the economy of South Louisiana is a big part of why it’s not considered an apocalyptic wasteland. It’s not great in it’s current state and is propped up on oil money and voodoo but I have no doubt I my mind that it would be a hellscape had the recovery been left solely to the good Ole boys in the state legislature. There is zero chance that the state would have had 5% of the money needed to recover to where they currently stand. The oil companies def would not have helped.

    All in all I am two beers in and this article hit a sore spot that I have. I hate FEMA but don’t think that in any way trump is going to help this situation. Even a broken clock is right twice a day…

    • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not disagreeing, but in addendum.

      What you’re describing is the end result of the Starve the Beast method of politics, to slowly break a social program so people don’t care when it’s axed.

    • Clasm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      You forget that their plans for an “overhaul” of any given program amounts to nothing more than cutting funding and hoping they can pull the wool over their constituents eyes with some new atrocity long enough to make everyone forget about how worse off their lives are now.

      • terry_jerry@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh I fully agree, I said as much in my second paragraph of ranting where I tried to back off of my personal hatred for them and point out the positive that they do. I know there is no intention of an actual replacement, and that “leave it to the states” will cause economic crisis. Again, I don’t agree with him I just also hold a belief that people shouldnt start defending FEMA as this benevolent government agency that only shits cotton candy for people that have lived through a natural disaster.