Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Map Enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz · 2 months agoLake depths and heightslemmy.dbzer0.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkLake depths and heightslemmy.dbzer0.comMelatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Map Enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz · 2 months agomessage-square12fedilink
minus-squareNielsBohron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-22 months agoThis map bothers me as they omit Lake Tahoe, which is higher than Baikal (~6,200 ft) and deeper than everything except Baikal (~1,600 ft deep) What’s the point of including all that empty space between Baikal and Titicaca when there’s a world renowned lake that would be great to include
minus-squaredeus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoThis was originally just a map of the Great Lakes system. Someone added Baikal and Titicaca to it later for comparison.
minus-squareMr_Blott@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoThe map makes absolutely no sense to 97% of the planet and that’s what bothers you? 😂
minus-squarecredo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 months agoSo you’re saying it’s not really special. Not the highest, not the deepest? Sure. Throw it in!
This map bothers me as they omit Lake Tahoe, which is higher than Baikal (~6,200 ft) and deeper than everything except Baikal (~1,600 ft deep)
What’s the point of including all that empty space between Baikal and Titicaca when there’s a world renowned lake that would be great to include
This was originally just a map of the Great Lakes system. Someone added Baikal and Titicaca to it later for comparison.
The map makes absolutely no sense to 97% of the planet and that’s what bothers you? 😂
So you’re saying it’s not really special. Not the highest, not the deepest?
Sure. Throw it in!