• bookmeat@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Now if they also directed the license cost savings back toward funding their newly chosen oss projects, we’d be golden.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Imagine. Companies that instead pay X amount pay X*.25 or something. Small cost for the business compared to Microsoft and huge boost in revenue to improve OSS.

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        B-but a study funded by CCIA Europe (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta…) says EU cloud sovereignty rules would cost Europe up to €233 billion. (Conveniently, it doesn’t count the benefits of not depending on them.)

        So considerate of them, worrying about our wallets out of pure altruism.

      • Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Even just a one-time monthly payment equivalent would be massive. I’ve seen companies that spend well over 60k a month on microsoft licenses.

        • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Imagine they paid their licensing fees to a new FOSS project for a year, one which aims to functionally replace the core of these cloud suites. Like file sharing/hosting/email/chat all integrated similar to Google workspace and M365. That would be a huge win for the people.