• TheMagicer@mtgzone.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 hours ago

    What do you more experienced players think of this? I’m kinda bad but this tiering doesn’t really fit my decks, as it puts 9/10 into T1 and the tenth one above T2 but below T3 because it’s got one “game changer” even though it’s definitely not my best-performing deck

    • janonymous@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      You don’t have to play 3 Game Changers for your deck to be in bracket 3. I think the “rules” are more like guard rails. It may be more helpful to consider the bracket descriptions to gauge where your decks fall. Just because your high power optimized deck adheres to the “rules” in bracket 1, doesn’t mean it is a bracket 1 deck. As they wrote, this will not protect you from bad actors.

      Edit: This is also answered in the FAQ part of the article:

      My best deck has no Game Changers and is technically a Bracket 2 deck. Should I play it there?

      You should play where you think you belong based on the descriptions. For example, if your deck has no-holds-barred power despite playing zero Game Changers, then you should play in Bracket 4!

    • bread@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Basically, these tiers are nothing new, and they’re not especially helpful. My strongest and weakest decks are in adjacent tiers, which tells me the whole thing is pointless at best, and harmful at worst because some people will feel justified in saying which tier their deck is, and obliterating the rest of the pod.

      If you’re playing with new people, the solution continues to be having a conversation, and these tiers do very little to affect that conversation.