It’s galling to me that the city has demanded that HE remove the shelters. Those don’t even belong to him. They are someone else’s home. Someone else’s property. Removing them would expose him to civil liability, not to mention responsibility for the harm that comes to the residents. If the city wants them removed, they have shown they no problem contracting bulldozers to take care of the problem.
The city counselor would like people to “work with them rather than work around them.” We’d fucking LIKE to. How about the city work WITH US instead of AGAINST US. A city that bulldozes people’s fucking homes does not get to pull this card.
It’s galling to me that the city has demanded that HE remove the shelters. Those don’t even belong to him. They are someone else’s home. Someone else’s property. Removing them would expose him to civil liability, not to mention responsibility for the harm that comes to the residents. If the city wants them removed, they have shown they no problem contracting bulldozers to take care of the problem.
The city counselor would like people to “work with them rather than work around them.” We’d fucking LIKE to. How about the city work WITH US instead of AGAINST US. A city that bulldozes people’s fucking homes does not get to pull this card.