• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Blaming voters for elites ruling us is kinda off IMHO

    After owners killed JFK, we have been in boiled frog scenario.

    • stardust@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      You have the same information available to you as everyone else. Yet I’m guessing you have a different stance on the issue than the “idiots”? How is that? I’m assuming you aren’t any richer than them, smarter, or connected.

      So if you can come to a rational conclusion on matters what is the excuse of other people? There’s likely not anything particular special about you that made you an exception from the masses.

    • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Then let us proceed down the “Oh it’s not in my control and therefore not my fault as a voter” trail because it’s done us fuck all any good.

      I’d prefer to review where there were options ignored though.

      General Trend in Primaries: Over the past decade, nearly 80% of eligible voters consistently did not participate in primaries, highlighting a persistent problem with voter engagement in these crucial election. (https://bipartisanpolicy.org/press-release/voters-dont-participate-primaries/)

      While a specific number isn’t universally accepted as “healthy,” the data suggests that aiming for turnout rates above 60-65% could be beneficial for both democratic engagement and public health outcomes. However, it’s important to note that the quality of civic participation and the inclusivity of voting policies are also crucial factors in assessing the health of a democracy, not just the turnout percentage alone. (https://democracyindex.hdhp.us/)

      2018 California Gov Primary: The turnout rate of 33.7% was the highest for a midterm primary election in California since 1998. The primary featured a large field of candidates, with 27 individuals appearing on the ballot across various parties. Despite a constellation of choice, voters still went with status quo. (https://www.courthousenews.com/california-2018-midterm-primary-turnout-highest-in-2-decades/) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_California_gubernatorial_election)

      2022 Idaho Gubernatorial Election: The turnout was 57.18%, a slight decrease from the previous election. Despite having five candidates on the ballot, including an independent candidate who received significant support, incumbent Republican Brad Little won re-election with 59.83% of the vote. This shows voters sticking with the status quo even with notable alternatives. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_United_States_gubernatorial_elections)

      2013 New York City Mayoral Election: 15 candidates appeared on the ballot across various parties. Turnout was relatively low, with only 1,087,710 total votes cast. Despite the large number of candidates, Bill de Blasio won decisively with 73.15% of the vote. The second-place candidate, Joe Lhota, received only 24.31% of the vote. Third-party and independent candidates collectively received less than 3% of the vote. Status quo upheld. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City_mayoral_elections)

      2022 Los Angeles Mayoral Election: Primary election had 12 candidates on the ballot. Top two candidates advanced to the general election. Karen Bass won with 54.82% of the vote (506,372 votes) / Rick Caruso received 45.18% (417,375 votes). Despite a large field of candidates in the primary, voters ultimately chose between two well-known figures in the runoff. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Los_Angeles_mayoral_election)