• takeda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 days ago

    The whole idea about forcing TikTok to be sold, is that right now TikTok doesn’t have to obey any laws.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Who is out there saying this? That’s ridiculous. Are foreign people exempt from our laws when they visit? No? Then why would you believe foreign companies are exempt?

          • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 days ago

            TikTok app merely being operational in the US is not presence. Implying that would be as ridiculous as giving a country jurisdiction over you becaues you sent a letter there.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 days ago

              It absolutely is presence. Otherwise the Brazilians couldn’t deal with X either. This is far more than sending a letter. And pretending we have no jurisdiction over companies operating in our country is ridiculous.

              • monk@lemmy.unboiled.info
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                Any real arguments for falling under jurisdiction for sending network packets? Does it have to be a company, or do you also have to abide by jurisdiction of the country I’m in? My server is in? Your server is in?

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  This isn’t a joke. This is pretty settled law. If you’re offering services in a country you must abide by their laws.