• tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    with no cohesive objectives

    That’s a pro. As soon as there’s a clear motif or leader, it’s very easy to undermine that single point of weakness. A general rabble sends the clear vibe of “we are not impressed, and might burn things” with the air of uncertainty to keep the powers that be on their toes.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Well I guess you can’t undermine a protest that isn’t protesting anything but that still doesn’t explain what the point of this non-protest protest is? How would a bunch of people not buying stuff for a day keep “the powers that be” (who? the capitalists? Their politicians? The police?) on their toes?

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        “We saw a blip in <sale/metric/police safety> and we think it correlates with the general unhappiness of the populace, as displayed here, here, and maybe here.”

        Blips can cause panic, even small ones

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Is it supposed to hit profit margins? Because I doubt it will, people will still be buying necessities at the same amount and call me cynical, but I believe almost everyone will be buying the non-necessities the days before and after.

          To be candid, it just sounds like the most toothless, do-nothing, slacktivism kind of protest that’s only meant to generate backpats

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            it could turn violent and do real damage to capital, that’s the beauty of an unfocused protest – the night is ever young