While consuming the content, you’re avoiding paying some content its price, because you protest how the content guards its commercial interests. Thus, ahoy!

  • Tempus Fugit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Time is our most precious resource and advertisers are here to waste it. I have no qualms telling them to fuck off.

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      i do block ads because they waste my time. that’s still piracy, and there’s a bajillion ethical reasons to commit piracy

  • one_old_coder@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ads are an unwanted local infection that brings malware and brainwash people. Blocking ads is the sane behavior, not piracy at all.

    Unless you’re giving food and shelter to every Jehovah’s Witness that comes to your home, then you’re the insane one.

  • nesc@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It does not have anything to do with sea so it’s not piracy, nor is it copying without license. You aren’t in a contract with people that show you ads, there is no legal requirement to do it. I don’t care about their commercial interests but care a whole lot about my time and interests, I feel no obligation to do it, nor care if some ad-supported thing will stop existing. Like fuck them lol.

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The deal is between the person paying for the ad and the person displaying the ad.

    I wasn’t ever involved in the deal, I owe them nothing.

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      you are involved in the deal, because advertisers pay by how many times the ad is displayed (or clicked). just like how you are involved in the deal between the distributor and cinema, because the pay depends on how many tickets you buy.

      • essell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If that’s the extent of my involvement, Following that thought, an ad blocker means I’m not involved in the deal anymore?

        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          as much as sneaking into a seat in a cinema without paying means you’re no longer involved in the deal. so yeah, you might have a point that you’re no longer involved in any deal, but i’d still call that piracy.

  • fum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ads are egregious attempts at brainwashing you into buying something. Blocking ads is morally correct. If something relies on ads, then its business model is broken.

  • PNW_Doug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Working to avoid the excesses of surveillance capitalism isn’t piracy, it’s self-defense.

  • stickly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is throwing away unopened junk mail stealing from the post office? Its the exact same thing

  • guy@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    When I ride my ad-subventioned subway and I look away from the ads, am I free riding the sub?

    • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      no, and neither is looking away from internet ads. blocking on the other hand stops the ad company from paying