• A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Could you link to the reply you’re quoting from please? I think there’s like a million extra comments now…

      • Kissaki@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        Quoting here for full context/content and archiving:

        Hello all,

        Thank you all for the vocal and clear feedback. We intended this change to simplify the setup for developers who use agents to build APIs with coding agents as we see many people struggling in wiring these up. Installing skills for coding agents is a new way of working with Postman and we thought that the in-product and website messaging conveys the intent.

        Based on the feedback from the community, we understand this wasn’t the case so we will be re-designing the experience with the right level of control.

        In the meantime, we are reverting this change.

        Notably, early earlier comments

        • provided proof that information on the website about the cli being included was added later than the issue report
        • one comment said they received this stuff as an update

        So the “in product and website messaging” seems like bullshit/lies evading accountability, attempting to change facts.

        The supposed goal of “simplify setup for developers who use agents” leading to changes on existing workflows and setups for people without explicit consent, confirmation, or information - questionable at best.

        Seems pretty clearly like malware/malware behavior.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Thanks. Looks like somebody hired just for customer service. You’re still correct with your assessment of course.