
That’s gotta be about as effective as when they narrowed down the list of suspects for killing the Healthcare ceo to “somebody who knows someone who has been grievous wronged by a health insurance company in this country”
That’s gotta be about as effective as when they narrowed down the list of suspects for killing the Healthcare ceo to “somebody who knows someone who has been grievous wronged by a health insurance company in this country”
Yea bigots generally aren’t shameful about their bigotry they just usually try to tap dance around the word bigot, good for you for being honest I guess.
Wow. So literally saying they should just assimilate, so much for that whole “they have to respect our culture because we respect theirs”
Also yea the third point was stupid, it was to illustrate how dumb your argument was.
Bit then you just came out and admitted to being a bigot and leapfrogging my point.
Your right should have said there’s multiple religions it was discriminating against just highlighting how it lines up with Frances history of Islamophobia.
Ok it’s a slightly different form of bigotry does that make it ok since your only argument seems to be “it’s not racism because it doesn’t explicitly say it’s discriminating against a specific race”
I was initially torn on this, but as long as it’s for all religions, I support it.
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread
Yea they made it so nobody could wear religious cultural clothes but there’s only one religion that includes wearing those clothes as a belief.
Would you also support a policy that nobody named @some_guy should be allowed to talk, no matter who they are.
Not to “Ermmm acshually” but you haven’t overcome the gravitational pull you’ve just counteracted it.
Overcoming it is significantlly more difficult.
The swirly line forms to the left.